I am always amazed how arrogantly electricians and electrical engineers react to the connection of graphene/graphene oxide and EMFs or on EMFs alone - they certainly have a clue about electronics, but 100% no idea how the organism reacts!!! Effects of electromagnetic fields exposure on the antioxidant defense system
I'm a fan of the global research platform. Sometimes people are distracted by imaginary threats and fail to see the real ones in front of their face. Graphene has been used as an adjuvant if I recall. To make a drug more effective like adding sticker to an herbicide. All this is beyond my understanding. I will pay attention to the dialogue but will not go down every rabbit hole out there. I won't be distracted from the in my face lies and propaganda about almost everything. I had enough information years ago to avoid the vaccine like the plague.
Sympathetic to your skepticism, but I suppose it's important to better understand the physics, I don't, but my dad slept under an electric blanket for decades to no ill effect. Likewise, power line workers see, to do OK (unless they fall or electrocute themselves.) 5G and cell phones likewise have been indicted, but not proven dangerous, unless you're looking at the phone while operating machinery. Pilots have been concerned about 5G proximity to navigation facilities, but that's not related to human physiology. 5G legitimate concerns about surveillance and facial recognition, not physiological. X rays are a concern but only in high dosage. To much worthy protest, Malathion was sprayed over populations for insect control. "In 1981, Collins was appointed by Democratic Governor Jerry Brown as Director of the California Conservation Corps. During his California Conservation Corps service, Collins gained notoriety for drinking a beaker of malathion to demonstrate his belief that it was safe."
BT Collins was a Vietnam war vet which literally cost him an arm and a leg.
Plutonium, here's an unforgettable one: The Myth of Plutonium Toxicity Bernard L. Cohen
"Plutonium is constantly referred to by the news media as “the most toxic substance known to man.” Ralph Nader has said that a pound of plutonium could cause 8 billion cancers, and former Senator Ribicoff has said that a single particle of plutonium inhaled into the lung can cause cancer. There is no scientific basis for any of these statements as I have shown in a paper in the refereed scientific journal Health Physics (Vol. 32, pp. 359–379, 1977). Nader asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to evaluate my paper, which they did in considerable depth and detail, but when they gave it a “clean bill of health” he ignored their report. When he accused me of “trying to detoxify plutonium with a pen,” I offered to eat as much plutonium as he would eat of caffeine, which my paper shows is comparably dangerous, or given reasonable TV coverage, to personally inhale 1000 times as much plutonium as he says would be fatal, or in response to former Senator Ribicoff’s statement to inhale 1000 particles of plutonium of any size that can be suspended in air. My offer was made to all major TV networks but there has never been a reply beyond a request for a copy of my paper. Yet the false statements continue in the news media and surely 95% of the public accept them as fact although virtually no one in the radiation health scientific community gives them credence. We have here a complete breakdown in communication between the scientific community and the news media, and an unprecedented display of irresponsibility by the latter. One must also question the ethics of Nader and Ribicoff; I have sent them my papers and written them personal letters, but I have never received a reply."
Always appreciate your investigations and concerns.
I'm a fan of the global research platform. Sometimes people are distracted by imaginary threats and fail to see the real ones in front of their face. Graphene has been used as an adjuvant if I recall. To make a drug more effective like adding sticker to an herbicide. All this is beyond my understanding. I will pay attention to the dialogue but will not go down every rabbit hole out there. I won't be distracted from the in my face lies and propaganda about almost everything. I had enough information years ago to avoid the vaccine like the plague.
Nice and thorough, but how about graphene hydroxide?
Hi, Proton Magic asked me to ask you if you've cancelled PMs subscription to your site and neither can PM post a comment.
Sympathetic to your skepticism, but I suppose it's important to better understand the physics, I don't, but my dad slept under an electric blanket for decades to no ill effect. Likewise, power line workers see, to do OK (unless they fall or electrocute themselves.) 5G and cell phones likewise have been indicted, but not proven dangerous, unless you're looking at the phone while operating machinery. Pilots have been concerned about 5G proximity to navigation facilities, but that's not related to human physiology. 5G legitimate concerns about surveillance and facial recognition, not physiological. X rays are a concern but only in high dosage. To much worthy protest, Malathion was sprayed over populations for insect control. "In 1981, Collins was appointed by Democratic Governor Jerry Brown as Director of the California Conservation Corps. During his California Conservation Corps service, Collins gained notoriety for drinking a beaker of malathion to demonstrate his belief that it was safe."
BT Collins was a Vietnam war vet which literally cost him an arm and a leg.
Plutonium, here's an unforgettable one: The Myth of Plutonium Toxicity Bernard L. Cohen
"Plutonium is constantly referred to by the news media as “the most toxic substance known to man.” Ralph Nader has said that a pound of plutonium could cause 8 billion cancers, and former Senator Ribicoff has said that a single particle of plutonium inhaled into the lung can cause cancer. There is no scientific basis for any of these statements as I have shown in a paper in the refereed scientific journal Health Physics (Vol. 32, pp. 359–379, 1977). Nader asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to evaluate my paper, which they did in considerable depth and detail, but when they gave it a “clean bill of health” he ignored their report. When he accused me of “trying to detoxify plutonium with a pen,” I offered to eat as much plutonium as he would eat of caffeine, which my paper shows is comparably dangerous, or given reasonable TV coverage, to personally inhale 1000 times as much plutonium as he says would be fatal, or in response to former Senator Ribicoff’s statement to inhale 1000 particles of plutonium of any size that can be suspended in air. My offer was made to all major TV networks but there has never been a reply beyond a request for a copy of my paper. Yet the false statements continue in the news media and surely 95% of the public accept them as fact although virtually no one in the radiation health scientific community gives them credence. We have here a complete breakdown in communication between the scientific community and the news media, and an unprecedented display of irresponsibility by the latter. One must also question the ethics of Nader and Ribicoff; I have sent them my papers and written them personal letters, but I have never received a reply."
Always appreciate your investigations and concerns.