THE TRUTH IS ALWAYS ON THE OTHER SIDE
Weather as a weapon by Tom Oliver Regenauer | February 26, 2023
https://www.regenauer.press/wetter-als-waffe
I have tried to translate this article - I hope it is understandable.
For over 70 years, people have been trying to usurp the weather, control it and abuse it as a geostrategic weapon. Time to get an overview of the history and status quo when it comes to geoengineering and to publicly discuss the topic, which is highly relevant to the entire species.
On May 1, 1958, physicist James A. Van Allen announced before the US National Academy of Sciences that the Geiger counters on board the satellites "Explorer 1" and "Explorer 2" had measured extraordinarily high radiation levels at various points in orbit . He concluded that the Earth must be surrounded by powerful radiation belts. Today is the one named after him Van Allen Belt silent witness that he was right. The scientist working at the University of Iowa made the first major discovery of the nascent space age - on the same day, employees of Operation Argus a top-secret US military project whose goal was to detonate nuclear weapons in near-Earth space in order to create an artificial radiation belt that could later be used as a weapon or barrier against attacks. The ionosphere should be conquered, controlled and exploited.
“ The universe is radioactive ,” noted Van Allen’s colleague Ernie Ray at the time. And the US military, represented by the Advanced Research Projects Agency ( ARPA , today DARPA ), which later developed ARPA-Net, the forerunner of the Internet and stealth technology, wanted to make it even more radioactive by exploding nuclear and thermonuclear warheads in order to be able to destroy enemy satellites or intercontinental missiles and disrupt enemy radio communications in times of war. So lap In the fall of 1958, a marine group released three 1.7 megaton bombs into space over the southern Atlantic in order to enrich the unknown expanses around the earth with particles and radioactive debris. The Soviet Union soon followed suit and initially detonated four smaller atomic bombs in orbit in 1961. Followed by three significantly larger warheads the following year. At a time when the Cuban Missile Crisis was nearing the peak of escalation.
This shows that the manipulation of the weather, the ionosphere and the atmosphere was much earlier list of more than 200 patent applications in this area. The first entry dates from 1891 and concerns the artificial production of rain. The most recent patent application dates from 2014 and describes an ion cannon that is said to be able to modify cloud formations. And this overview only includes the publicly known US patents. It can be assumed that the American military and a large number of developed industrial nations have comparable “innovations”.
The history of weather manipulation is long, confused and opaque because, in addition to civilian uses, the focus has always been on potential military benefits. Employees of the General Electric Research Laboratory (GERL) created the first man-made snowstorm in history off the coast of New York City (USA) on November 13, 1946. Based on the first successful interventions in weather events, the United States founded the “Advisory Committee on Weather Control” in August 1953. The organization was engaged in the publication in 1958 Final report still primarily with national possible uses of “ cloud seeding ” (cloud seeding) in agriculture. But as early as December 11, 1950, a short article in the Charleston Daily Mail showed where the journey was to go. The newspaper quoted the scientist Dr. Irving Langmuir , who was involved in the GERL's early experiments.
»Rain production or weather control can be as powerful a weapon of war as the atomic bomb, says a Nobel Prize-winning physicist. Dr. Rainmaking pioneer Irving Langmuir said the government should treat the phenomenon of weather control in the same way it treats nuclear energy (…). In terms of the amount of energy released, the effect of 30 milligrams of silver iodide under optimal conditions is equivalent to that of an atomic bomb, says Langmuir.
The US Air Force (USAF) climbed into one report on the subject of “Warfare 2025” from 1996 already stated that it would control the global weather for military purposes. The document continues:
»Weather modification will become part of national and international security and could be carried out unilaterally (…). It could have offensive and defensive applications and even be used for deterrence purposes. The ability to generate precipitation, fog, and storms on Earth or to modify space weather, (…) and the generation of artificial weather are part of an integrated set of technologies that will significantly increase U.S. capabilities or diminish U.S. capabilities Enable opponents to achieve global (…) reach and power.«
Taking these historical backgrounds into account, the news portal illuminated Slate in a September 2010 article the “ disturbing history of geoengineering .” Author James Fleming titles his text with the headline: “ Weather as a weapon ”. Not wrongly. This shows how extensive the efforts were to specifically use weather as a weapon, especially during the Cold War Article of the "Smithsonian Magazine" from December 5, 2011. Author Matt Novak describes the growing concern of the Western powers in the 1950s that Russia would soon control the world's thermometers. And also the English newspaper The Guardian asked on February 16, 2015, not without reason: » Can the CIA use the weather as a weapon? «. Although Guardian author Patrick Barkham rejected any theories about the active use of geoengineering at the end of his article, it was controversial Although HAARP technology and the operational feasibility of global weather manipulation are absurd, he highlights some correct information in the text. Quote:
»Cloud seeding became a reality in 1967/68 when the US Operation Popeye "Increased rainfall over parts of Vietnam by an estimated 30 percent to reduce the movement of soldiers and resources into South Vietnam."
But it wasn't just the military that wanted to take advantage of weather manipulation. Rainmaking became commercialized. In the land of unlimited corruption, an entire industry is busy trying to rise above nature. This is demonstrated by companies like the one founded in 1961 and based in North Dakota Weather Modification Inc. , whose privately bookable offering covers everything from selective intervention to full-blown weather modification programs. Or the one founded in the 1950s Weather Modification Association , a kind of umbrella organization for the industry, which claims to be responsible for managing expectations between sponsors and the scientific community as well as supra-regional coordination of “ atmospheric water management ”.
Companies such as ICE (Ice Crystal Engineering). Companies like Brazen Geoengineering are currently developing so-called mini-volcanoes that, hanging from balloons, are supposed to release particles into the stratosphere in order to cool down the planet. The author Susette Horspool leads in one Editorial As of July 2022, over 150 active cloud seeding and geoengineering projects were already counted worldwide in 2012. Trend: rising sharply. Whether America, India or China – Homo sapiens have been trying vehemently to control the weather for over 70 years. And without being able to really estimate the long-term consequences.
Particularly in the “Middle Kingdom,” efforts to manipulate the weather have reached unprecedented levels. See the widely criticized weather control at the Olympic Games in 2016. The author, journalist and former professional pilot William Langewiesche already wrote about China's efforts to control the weather in one Article entitled "Stealing Weather" for the May 1, 2008 "Vanity Fair":
»Under the nominal guidance of the China Meteorological Administration (CMA), local weather departments across the country are now independently assessing their options and regularly heading out to seed clouds. According to the CMA, 39,000 field staff are involved. They are equipped with 7,113 anti-aircraft guns and 4,991 truck-mounted rocket launchers. In 2006, they fired a million shots at Weather and launched 80,000 rockets. For the most ambitious effort, they had access to 35 specially equipped aircraft, which flew 590 missions that year and delivered 26,158 pounds of dry ice, 1,487 pounds of silver iodide and 2,300 gallons of liquid nitrogen. Overall, operators reported covering more than a third of China's landmass, excluding Taiwan."
The whole of China could be covered with just under 100 aircraft. With an area of 9,596,960 square kilometers, it is the third largest country in the world. For the entire land area of the planet, almost 150 million square kilometers, around 1,500 aircraft would be necessary. However, only if they are used in parallel worldwide. If you regionalize and sequence geoengineering activities, you could easily get by with a fleet of 500 to 750 aircraft and still be able to cover the entire globe.
Published in 2016, an overview of the history of atmospheric research and weather manipulation is provided Book “Inventing Atmospheric Science” by Professor James R. Fleming. Based on the work of three researchers, it shows how bold ideas about subjugating the weather god became everyday practice. Sources and research that go beyond these absolutely undisputed facts, for example on “ Textron ”, a company founded in 1923, military-industrial US author Peter A. Kirby offers a detailed analysis of the history of military-coordinated weather manipulation in his Book "Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project" from 2020. The title of Kirby's 600-page tome already reveals one of the problems that one encounters when researching this topic - the terminology.
Because you search on Google Chemtrails or Geoengineering , there are mainly fact checks that characterize the topic as an abstruse fantasy. Or texts from state-affiliated publications that often criticize the idea of global weather manipulation, but at the same time deny that it is already taking place on a large scale. These projects are only in the conceptual stage, is the tenor of, for example Max Planck Society and Heinrich Böll Foundation . And that too Federal Environment Agency speaks only of “ ideas ” in a statement on geoengineering governance . Useful information can only be found when you use a real search engine - see Presearch or Metacrawler – searches for terms such as “ Solar Radiation Management ”, “ Stratospheric Aerosol Injection ”, “ Atmospheric Water Resources Management ” or “ Carbon Dioxide Removal ”.
While cloud seeding is taking place in many industrialized nations or even the United Arab Emirates is now commonplace, terms like chemtrails , Geoengineering or Weather warfare continued reflexive defensive reactions or dismissive dismissal. Attention, conspiracy theories! This is despite the fact that the processes cited have even been described by US chief strategists such as Zbigniew Brzezinski. From today's perspective, it seems almost clairvoyant Book He wrote “Between Two Ages” in 1970:
»Today the most industrially advanced countries (primarily the United States) are beginning to emerge from the industrial stage of their development. You are entering an age in which technology, and especially electronics - hence my neologism Technoronic - are increasingly becoming the main determinants of social change, transforming society's mores, social structure, values and global perspective. (…) I foresee a time when we have the means and will therefore inevitably succumb to the temptation to manipulate the behavior and intellectual functions of all people through environmental and biochemical manipulation of the brain. (…)
Not only will new weapons have been developed, but some of the fundamental concepts of geography and strategy will have been fundamentally changed; Space and weather control have replaced Suez or Gibraltar as key elements of the strategy. In addition to improved rocket technology, multi-missiles, and more powerful and precise bombs, future developments may well include automated or manned space warships, deep-sea facilities, chemical and biological weapons, death rays, and other forms of warfare - even the weather will be able to be manipulated. (…) By 2018, technology will provide the leaders of major nations with a variety of techniques for conducting secret warfare, requiring only a bare minimum of security forces to be involved." (pp. 5, 12, 28)
Also the former CIA director John O Brennan reasoned with one speech before the influential geopolitics think tank "Council on Foreign Relations" (CFR) in 2016 publicly about the potential of geoengineering, when he put the annual cost of a comprehensive program in the USA at ten billion US dollars and "Stratospheric Aerosol Injection« (SAI) as his preferred variant for the sustainable change of the earth's atmosphere. The statements by US Navy Captain Howard Thomas Orville in 1958 made it clear that the geostrategists were never concerned with the simple “ seeding ” of clouds or post-modern rainmaking for individual large farms and areas of land essay More than half a century ago, called “Weather as a Weapon,” he described the seven known methods for global weather manipulation that were already feasible at the time.
Gas clouds dispersed by aircraft to increase or decrease the amount of solar energy reaching Earth.
Electronic bombardment of the ionosphere to alter its electrical charge.
Controlled thermonuclear reaction to heat large areas of the atmosphere.
Reflectors on space platforms to focus the sun's rays on Earth.
Heat-absorbing substances on the polar ice caps.
Dye, oil or vegetation on marine areas to change their reflective properties.
Chemicals on the ocean surface to influence evaporation and therefore precipitation.
Orville ends this list with the sentence: » All of these methods would regulate the distribution of heat in different parts of the earth's atmosphere. This is the basis of global weather control «. The importance of the topic of weather control specifically for the US military is illustrated report that has existed since 1946 Air War College dated April 1993. On page three, the document with the telling title " Weather Modification: The Ultimate Weapon " states:
»The first question that must be answered when examining the military use of weather is whether such techniques have any military use. This question is very easy to answer with yes. Even local manipulation of smaller weather systems is critical to disrupting an enemy's operations at critical times. Perhaps one day the fog of war will be more than just a descriptive allusion to the battlefield. When you consider the crucial role that weather has played in many battles, it is clear that the ability to change the weather will be a huge advantage for the military. (…) Despite the enormous military utility of offensive weather modification, the use of this technology must be viewed as morally despicable. However, this does not mean that all research into the offensive use of weather modification should be stopped, as there are a number of governments that do not feel constrained by conventional morality. At least one should have the opportunity to detect attempts to change the weather in order to actively counteract these effects. In fact, in the early 1970s it had Project Nile Blue Top priority for the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA).«
But it's not just the United States military-industrial complex that is enthusiastic about geoengineering. The German Bundeswehr is also involved in this area. This shows a 48 page comprehensive Strategy paper of the “Future Analysis Department” of the Bundeswehr Planning Office from November 2012. On page ten, under the subheading “New Danger,” the said department states ambiguously:
»Beyond what has been described so far, non-state actors could also potentially use geoengineering. A radicalized and financially strong actor could see himself as the savior of the world and carry out a massive SRM operation by introducing particles into the stratosphere. To do this, it needs the appropriate infrastructure to be able to introduce particles into the stratosphere. Unlike other SRM measures that have to be operated continuously, this could represent a global and ongoing measure due to the long residence time of particles in the stratosphere. Such private use would be difficult for states to prevent.”
According to reports from the Forbes magazine and others News portals not recently a world-famous one philanthropist with a dubious reputation for wanting to darken the sun using artificial dust? Maybe that's why the government of Mexico has one in early 2023 Press release published in which it announced that geoengineering experiments on its territory would be banned in the future?
In any case, people in Washington don't seem to have any concerns about this Project shows the Biden administration is developing an official five-year plan for “climate intervention.” Who is surprised? There is a tradition in the United States of using the population as guinea pigs for the military, secret services and Big Pharma. This is proven by the shockingly long time list unethical experiments that people in the United States have been unknowingly subjected to since the mid-19th century.
In Great Britain, the government also finances geoengineering projects such as SPICE, whose official website also has one Overview of the various substances that are released as particles over the heads of the population. However, SPICE provides worryingly little information about the health implications of the large-scale application of sulfates, sulfur dioxide, silver iodide, aluminum, silicone, titanium or zinc oxide. Furthermore, it is questionable to what extent the completeness of this list can be trusted. Because already the biologist Paul Ehrlich said in 1969 in reference to the supposedly threatening population explosion:
"If voluntary methods of birth reduction do not work, a nation may have to resort to adding a temporary sterilant to staple foods or water supplies."
It takes little imagination to imagine that states or financially strong interest groups would hardly shy away from distributing such substances to the people through alleged geoengineering ventures if they feel threatened by overpopulation. And this is obviously the case in all industrialized nations. Wherever the “Woko Haram” has taken over the sovereignty of interpretation and started the class struggle from above, Homo sapiens is seen as a problem. The state views its own population as a threat. As ballast. In this scenario, why should one still assume at any point that the incumbent government is acting for the benefit of its own people?
The faceless empires of postmodernism unscrupulously ignore the flood of severe mRNA vaccine damage and a strikingly high excess mortality rate of 37 percent (as of: December 2022 , Germany) - why should you worry about the negative effects of chemicals used to save the climate on the population when the activities in this area generate significantly less visibility than a nationwide, agitatingly communicated injection campaign. The government and mainstream media are not even talking in detail about the devastating effects of the widely visible chemical accidents, natural disasters and major fires that have darkened the sky over many cities or contaminated the earth and water with conspicuous frequency over the past four weeks.
In East Palestine (Ohio, USA) a train containing highly toxic chemicals derailed on February 3rd. Because, according to official information, the wedged wagons and their unstable contents could not be recovered, the toxic cargo was allowed to burn down in a “ controlled ” manner – thus creating a “ second Chernobyl ,” as it were Business Insider local media quoted. One arose over the city A column of smoke that was hardly inferior to a mushroom cloud. While animals in the surrounding area are dying, pets are dying and the waters of East Palestine are shimmering in rainbow colors because of the chemicals deposited there, the government sees no risks for the population. The air is safe, the drinking water is safe, said the mayor. This Behave - described in detail in the linked video by independent journalist Ryan Cristian from timecode 30:10 - can hardly be described as anything other than negligent killing of one's own population.
Statistically derailed in the United States 1,704 trains per year. Many of them transport sensitive goods. There are hardly any protective measures for the population. The infrastructure of the USA is similar to that of a third world country. Perhaps this also explains the fact that the five environmental specialists who went to East Palestine to determine the actual level of contamination never reached their destination. Because you Airplane unexpectedly crashed on the way to the scene of the accident. All inmates died. A precise analysis of the environmental impact and health risks for residents is still pending.
After the chemical disaster in Ohio, almost a dozen other industrial sites in the USA caught fire in a short space of time, sending black toxic clouds into the stratosphere. Including other chemical plants and one Metal factory . The fire has been burning since February 23rd three oil storage facilities of the Mexican state-owned company “Pemex” and pollute the air. Surprisingly, you don't hear a word from representatives of the "last generation" about these strikingly synchronous catastrophes. The same applies to governments, environmental protection organizations or the leading media. Radio silence. Although a whole lot of presumably toxic substances are likely to rain down on the earth soon, or are already doing so.
In China , a country whose technocratic-collectivist social model is cited by top politicians such as Robert Habeck and Justin Trudeau as a role model, distributed automated Drone swarms Disinfectant across entire neighborhoods to combat a flu virus. People were sealed in their buildings, interned and starved. Collateral damage was secondary in the war against the plague. And during mass protests, the same drones presumably spray sedatives to emotionally shut down the angry mob. If the ruling caste sees a zero-Covid hell like in the "Middle Kingdom" as the ideal model of rule and accepts any collateral damage in the war against an invisible enemy, you can be sure that they don't care about human lives.
This probably explains why there is no public discussion on the subject of geoengineering, even though governments around the world are working hard to control the planetary protective shield. Independent reporting, detailed information, hearings, parliamentary debates, special programs, transparent, scientific discourse? Not a trace. Here and there, difficult-to-locate documents from official bodies provide insight into the multitude of parallel activities taking place in this area. A protocol of the “Committee on Science and Technology” of the US House of Representatives on November 5, 2009 illustrates the enthusiasm that is being shown in this regard:
»Scientific hypotheses addressing geoengineering were published as early as the middle of the 20th century, but serious consideration of the topic has only begun in recent years. In 1992, the National Academies of Sciences published a brief overview of climate engineering concepts and provided rough cost estimates for injecting aerosols into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight. The academies will also complete a report in early 2010, some of which will formally address geoengineering. The Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) plans to do the same in its 5th report, which is due to be completed in 2014. (…) NASA held workshops in April 2007 to discuss solar radiation management options. In May 2008, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) organized the forum “Geoengineering: Workshop on Unilateral Planetary Scale Geoengineering”. In early 2009, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) began considering funding certain geoengineering research initiatives. And the NSF has funded independent research projects on possible impacts. Last Friday, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) hosted a symposium entitled "Creating a Cooler World: Can We Do It?" Should we do it?”.
Whether they can do it can hardly be reliably determined. They probably don't know themselves, since climate and weather are non-linear, chaotic systems. But it would be better if they left it alone or controlled it. Because you follow the from Handelsblatt quoted statements from the almost fanatic Harvard researchers and geoengineering advocate David Keith , who along with Bill Gates the Scopex experiment " At best , this approach saves humanity from climate change, while at worst it could lead to the extinction of life on Earth ."
That they do can be confirmed with almost certainty. Even if official publications mostly only talk about ideas and concepts, the historical facts cited above suggest that relevant interest groups have long been implementing international climate control programs with little regard for collateral damage to the population. Logistically, geoengineering has long been feasible on a global scale. And targeted or tolerated influence on the fertility, physical development or mental health of Homo sapiens cannot be ruled out in the course of such programs. Too often languages and speak representatives or Thought leader of neo-feudalism about wanting to reduce the world population and having to reduce it. What could be more obvious than using synergistic effects and pursuing two goals in parallel for reasons of cost efficiency?
The deluded end-time ideology of the climate apocalyptists and bioethicists seems to have called into action exactly those pseudo-humanistic world savers that the Bundeswehr's "Future Analysis Department" diligently warned against in its previously quoted strategy paper. Those who feel called by higher graces to shape the planet and its inhabitants according to their ideas.
What they do can be partially understood and guessed based on the information collected in this text. Even if not every contrail in the sky represents a geoengineering attack, it can still be assumed that particles are already being released over a wide area in the troposphere and stratosphere to control the weather. In the worst case, even for population control. Even if this has not yet been explicitly proven. The evidence certainly allows such conclusions to be drawn as a working hypothesis. In addition, there are exceptional meteorological phenomena and mysterious plate tectonic events There has recently been sufficient reason to believe that extreme weather and natural disasters could now function as geostrategic weapons. Anyone who thinks this is unlikely should at least ask themselves why Scientific American reported on February 28, 2023 about a United Nations (UN) paper that calls for geoengineering activities to be regulated globally. This would hardly be necessary if such activities were not already taking place on a wide scale.
The more intensively you delve into this complex of topics, the more questions arise. Questions whose answers require the verification of a large amount of further information - and which therefore have to be taken up in a sequel.
“Everyone talks about the weather, but no one does anything about it.” (Mark Twain)
And THAT is also worth reading - enter it into a translator!!
https://www.manova.news/artikel/nahrung-als-waffe
Food as a weapon
Food scarcity has always been a tool of domination — new forms of food modification are now sharpening this weapon.
https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PCAAB500.pdf
Excellent essay, thank you.